History is repeating itself. The world thinks what Hitler did, could never happen again.  However, it is!

Nuremberg Code (1947) brief history

The Nuremberg trials were a series of trials held between 1945 and 1949. Durning these trials, the Allies prosecuted German military leaders, political officials, industrialists, and financiers for crimes they had committed during World War II. Therefore, the result was incarceration and sentencing of many of Germany’s perpetrators of crimes against humanity including acts associated with the holocaust.

Nuremberg defendants were divided into groups according to their wartime activities and positions. There were the medical trials, which was a prosecution of doctors and other medical officials for the hideous experiments that maimed and murdered countless concentration-camp inmates and POWs.

Nuremberg Medical Trials

The Nuremberg Code was written in 1947 during the trial in Nuremberg, Germany. These doctors conducted medical experiments on more than 7,000 concentration camp prisoners during World War II.

This article is a discussion of the experimental drugs used on WWII prisoners. In addition, I want to correlate what happened in the past and what is happening today.

Inmates were used to test immunization compounds and antibodies for the prevention and treatment of contagious diseases. These diseases included malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, and infectious hepatitis.

Physicians at Ravensbrück conducted experiments in bone-grafting. Newly developed sulfa (sulfanilamide) drugs were tested on prisoners without safety protocols. At Natzweiler and Sachsenhausen, prisoners were exposed  to phosgene and mustard gas in order to test possible antidotes.

Additional gruesome experiments meant to further Nazi racial goals included  a series of sterilization. Scientist tested a number of methods in an effort to develop an efficient and inexpensive procedure for the mass sterilization. 

These people were not given a choice! They had horridness experiments forced on them!

Fast forward to today

We, the people of the world, are being experimented on this very moment. The Covid-19 is not about the virus, it’s about the drugs.

1. This is an experimental drug. Not a vaccine.
2. These experimental drugs have not gone through the safety protocol.
3. The experimental drugs are not approved by the FDA.
4. To date, there has been no effective vaccine for the Corona Viruses
5. The pharmaceutical companies are not held liable for the harm this experiment is causing on people.

There is no denying that Covid-19 is one of several strains of Corona virus that affects humans. In addition, it enveloped the entire globe within a few short months. In December, 2019, the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) picked up on a Wuhan media statement about “viral pneumonia”.  So it began.

We are expected to believe Covid-19 is one of the deadliest viruses to date. Also, the world is told that safe drugs like Hydroxychloroquine don’t work. In actuality, it’s safe and effective in treating patients with early onset of Covid-19. It is proven to be effective in preventing infection from the Corona virus.

Facts about survival rates

According to the CDC, survival rates with Covid-19 without treatment is:

• Age 0-19: 99.997%
• Age 20-49: 99.98%
• Age 50-69: 99.5%
• Age 70+: 94.6%

With survival rates being this high, you must ask yourself, “Why would I want to take an experimental drug?”

Another question one must ask, “Why is the government involved with medical decisions?” “Why are our doctors being threatened that they will lose their medical license if they don’t fall in line?”

Nurses and other health care providers are being told they will lose their jobs if they don’t take the injection. Students are told they can not come to school without taking the injection.

Are these employers willing to take on the liability risk if an employee is harmed by taking the injection? Are the schools prepared to be sued if a child is disabled from the injection? These institutions did threatened loss of livelihood and denial of admission to schools, which opens them up for lawsuits.

More facts

• Covid antibody tests have been found to be up to 50% inaccurate, yet the CDC instructs attending physicians to list ANYONE WHO DIES FOR ANY REASON, but is presumed to have Covid-19-like symptoms or positive test results, as a Covid-19 death.
• It has been verified that reported Covid-19 death numbers are being grossly over-reported by as much as 50%.
• The Covid-19 mortality rate is dropping precipitously, currently at between 0.015% and 0.025%, lock step with influenza.99% of Covid-19-related deaths occur in the extreme elderly and in those with at least three (3) co-morbidities.
• The CDC has discovered that just of 6% of all Covid-19 “attributed” deaths are actually caused directly and entirely by the virus.

These facts are from American’s Frontline Doctors.

Listen to PETER A. McCULLOUGH, MD, MPH FACP, FACC, FCCP, FAHA, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA

 

In Conclusion

To date, the governments of the world are trying to mandate that every human have this experimental drug. These governments are saying that children as young as 12 years old can decide to take the experimental drug without parental consent.

Are you willing to allow a governmental official dictate to you on what’s best for you? When did we lose our choice to decide what’s best for us and our families?

Around 800 people under the age of 30 have developed an inflammation of the heart muscle called myocarditis. This can lead to heart failure.

Children’s and pregnant women’s protocol are more stringent on vaccine safety than the general population. However, these two groups are now being included in the experiment.

New evidence is coming out daily about the lie the world has been told about this “plandemic”. New evidence about how this experimental drug is a higher risk to certain ethnic groups has come out. Concerns about sterilization in the reproductive age group is coming to the surface.

Because you are now part of a global “clinical trial”, your medical records are open to the pharmaceutical companies. Long-term health issues will be devastating to the people of the world.

Thousands of people have died from this experimental drug!

As a nurse of 47 years, it was my duty to be an advocate for my patients. As a citizen of the world, it’s my responsibility to speak the truth in matters of health care.

Don’t take my word for any of this information! Do your own research! But, know, you will have to dig for the truth. It’s out there.

I had to give a lot of thought before writing this article. But, it came down to the fact that I can no longer sit on the sidelines and keep quiet. I try to stay away from politics. However, politics has invaded my world as a health care provider.

Resources

http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

   The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

 

 

Most of all, pray that you will be led to the truth before it’s too late!

Remember, divided we fall! United we stand! We must unite and demand that the truth be revealed!