#experimental drugs – Welcome To Mind/Body Connection Hypnosis by Janet Lynas Ph.D., N.H.D.

Anger is an emotion I don’t experience very often. However, I feel angry right now. To be honest, I’m enraged! The reason for my exasperation is related to current events. For instance, I’m upset with members of my profession.

Do no harm

Doctors and nurses take an oath to do no harm. Nurses are advocates for their patients. We take our role to protect our patients seriously. At times, that includes standing up to a doctor who is not listening to what our patient is telling them.

Therefore, as one who stands my ground to protect my patients, it infuriates me to see the harm being done to people throughout the world. As an Infection Prevention Nurse, I know a lie when I hear it. And I’ve heard a lot of lies in the last eighteen months.

Having said this, I now see bullying happening to the medical staff working in patient care. Their livelihood is being threatened to force compliance with taking an experimental drug. Current research shows that thousands of people have died from this experiment. Not only have thousands died, but hundreds of thousands are injured from this drug.

However, this article is not about the injustice being done to people worldwide. I will not get into the political aspect of current events. This article is about anger.

Anger’s two sides

We like to think that an emotion is either good or bad. In reality, it’s neither. It’s what we do with an emotion that makes it good or bad.

I do practice what I preach. So, I find I need to take a step back and examine why I’m so angry.

In my book, Guilty Prayers, I have a chapter on anger. I share a true story about how anger affects one when it gets out of control. When an emotion overwhelms an individual, their life is often put on a road to destruction. When one becomes stuck in anger, their health is affected in an adverse way.

What happens when anger is out of control

Let me be very clear, uncontrolled anger will kill you if one doesn’t recognize what is happening and deal with it.

1. One long-term physical effect of uncontrolled anger is increased anxiety, high blood pressure and headache. (I have a headache at this time. Time to have a reality check.)

2. Suppressed anger is stored in the body as tension. This rage contributes to high blood pressure. High blood pressure can lead to stroke or heart attack.

3. Studies have linked high levels of hostility to an increased risk of respiratory problems.

4. Research shows that continuous high levels of anger is directly associated with a shortened lifespan due to the impact on the body.

This is the short version of ill effects on the body. Read my book, Guilty Prayers for the details.

How to deal with anger

Recognizing that you are angry and that it isn’t resolving is the first step. You have to be honest with yourself. First, admit to yourself that you are angry and second, it’s not going away.

Strategies for anger management include regular exercise, learning relaxation techniques and in some cases counseling. Another effective tool is hypnosis.

There comes a time when it’s necessary to remove oneself from the situation that’s causing your destress. I always advised the veterans I worked with at the Veteran’s Administration to stop watching the news. Once they stopped, they reported the anger felt was dissipating.

I have to admit, I have not watched mainstream news media in over twenty years. This source of news is propaganda with little truth being reported. I do however, research current events and have found several reliable sources of information.

In this case, the source of my agitation comes from listening to colleagues who are being bullied. I’m thankful that I left allopathic medicine four years ago. It makes me feel ashamed at those who are demanding that staff put themselves in harms way. There is no clinical evidence base performance standards to support Administration’s demand to control staff in this manner. Actually, what’s being forced on all peoples breaks the Nuremberg Code. Reference my article on experimental drugs and the Nuremberg Code.

Wrapping it up

I’m mad! But, I know I’m upset and why. By admitting my anger to myself, I’m better able to move past this feeling. So, what am I doing to practice what I preach?

I find walking is a good stress reliever for me. In the last couple of weeks, I walked about 30 miles. (I told you I am upset.) However, where I live, it’s too hot to walk right now. As a result of this heat, I switched over to swimming laps in a pool.

I admit that there’s absolutely nothing I can do about the current situation. Knowing this, I turn to prayer and release what I know I have no control over. I meditate often. In practicing these techniques, I feel my frustration subsiding. Writing this article has helped a great deal in calming myself down.

So, when you feel angry and you know it’s out of control, take control of your emotions. You are not helpless and your emotions do not dictate to you.

Step back and take a long hard look at what’s going on. Then take action to control what’s going on with your feelings. If you’re not able to take control, ask for help. It’s your life.

It’s not about what life throws at you, but how you react to it.

Take control! You’ve got this!

History is repeating itself. The world thinks what Hitler did, could never happen again. However, it is!

Nuremberg Code (1947) brief history

The Nuremberg trials were a series of trials held between 1945 and 1949. Durning these trials, the Allies prosecuted German military leaders, political officials, industrialists, and financiers for crimes they had committed during World War II. Therefore, the result was incarceration and sentencing of many of Germany’s perpetrators of crimes against humanity including acts associated with the holocaust.

Nuremberg defendants were divided into groups according to their wartime activities and positions. There were the medical trials, which was a prosecution of doctors and other medical officials for the hideous experiments that maimed and murdered countless concentration-camp inmates and POWs.

Nuremberg Medical Trials

The Nuremberg Code was written in 1947 during the trial in Nuremberg, Germany. These doctors conducted medical experiments on more than 7,000 concentration camp prisoners during World War II.

This article is a discussion of the experimental drugs used on WWII prisoners. In addition, I want to correlate what happened in the past and what is happening today.

Inmates were used to test immunization compounds and antibodies for the prevention and treatment of contagious diseases. These diseases included malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, and infectious hepatitis.

Physicians at Ravensbrück conducted experiments in bone-grafting. Newly developed sulfa (sulfanilamide) drugs were tested on prisoners without safety protocols. At Natzweiler and Sachsenhausen, prisoners were exposed to phosgene and mustard gas in order to test possible antidotes.

Additional gruesome experiments meant to further Nazi racial goals included a series of sterilization. Scientist tested a number of methods in an effort to develop an efficient and inexpensive procedure for the mass sterilization.

These people were not given a choice! They had horridness experiments forced on them!

Fast forward to today

We, the people of the world, are being experimented on this very moment. The Covid-19 is not about the virus, it’s about the drugs.

This is an experimental drug. Not a vaccine.
These experimental drugs have not gone through the safety protocol.
The experimental drugs are not approved by the FDA.
To date, there has been no effective vaccine for the Corona Viruses
The pharmaceutical companies are not held liable for the harm this experiment is causing on people.

There is no denying that Covid-19 is one of several strains of Corona virus that affects humans. In addition, it enveloped the entire globe within a few short months. In December, 2019, the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) picked up on a Wuhan media statement about “viral pneumonia”. So it began.

We are expected to believe Covid-19 is one of the deadliest viruses to date. Also, the world is told that safe drugs like Hydroxychloroquine don’t work. In actuality, it’s safe and effective in treating patients with early onset of Covid-19. It is proven to be effective in preventing infection from the Corona virus.

Facts about survival rates

According to the CDC, survival rates with Covid-19 without treatment is:

Age 0-19: 99.997%
Age 20-49: 99.98%
Age 50-69: 99.5%
Age 70+: 94.6%

With survival rates being this high, you must ask yourself, “Why would I want to take an experimental drug?”

Another question one must ask, “Why is the government involved with medical decisions?” “Why are our doctors being threatened that they will lose their medical license if they don’t fall in line?”

Nurses and other health care providers are being told they will lose their jobs if they don’t take the injection. Students are told they can not come to school without taking the injection.

Are these employers willing to take on the liability risk if an employee is harmed by taking the injection? Are the schools prepared to be sued if a child is disabled from the injection? These institutions did threatened loss of livelihood and denial of admission to schools, which opens them up for lawsuits.

More facts

Covid antibody tests have been found to be up to 50% inaccurate, yet the CDC instructs attending physicians to list ANYONE WHO DIES FOR ANY REASON, but is presumed to have Covid-19-like symptoms or positive test results, as a Covid-19 death.
It has been verified that reported Covid-19 death numbers are being grossly over-reported by as much as 50%.
The Covid-19 mortality rate is dropping precipitously, currently at between 0.015% and 0.025%, lock step with influenza.99% of Covid-19-related deaths occur in the extreme elderly and in those with at least three (3) co-morbidities.
The CDC has discovered that just of 6% of all Covid-19 “attributed” deaths are actually caused directly and entirely by the virus.

These facts are from American’s Frontline Doctors.

Listen to PETER A. McCULLOUGH, MD, MPH FACP, FACC, FCCP, FAHA, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA

In Conclusion

To date, the governments of the world are trying to mandate that every human have this experimental drug. These governments are saying that children as young as 12 years old can decide to take the experimental drug without parental consent.

Are you willing to allow a governmental official dictate to you on what’s best for you? When did we lose our choice to decide what’s best for us and our families?

Around 800 people under the age of 30 have developed an inflammation of the heart muscle called myocarditis. This can lead to heart failure.

Children’s and pregnant women’s protocol are more stringent on vaccine safety than the general population. However, these two groups are now being included in the experiment.

New evidence is coming out daily about the lie the world has been told about this “plandemic”. New evidence about how this experimental drug is a higher risk to certain ethnic groups has come out. Concerns about sterilization in the reproductive age group is coming to the surface.

Because you are now part of a global “clinical trial”, your medical records are open to the pharmaceutical companies. Long-term health issues will be devastating to the people of the world.

Thousands of people have died from this experimental drug!

As a nurse of 47 years, it was my duty to be an advocate for my patients. As a citizen of the world, it’s my responsibility to speak the truth in matters of health care.

Don’t take my word for any of this information! Do your own research! But, know, you will have to dig for the truth. It’s out there.

I had to give a lot of thought before writing this article. But, it came down to the fact that I can no longer sit on the sidelines and keep quiet. I try to stay away from politics. However, politics has invaded my world as a health care provider.

Resources

http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

Most of all, pray that you will be led to the truth before it’s too late!

Remember, divided we fall! United we stand! We must unite and demand that the truth be revealed!

Tag: #experimental drugs

Anger by Janet Lynas, Ph.D., N.H.D.